<h2>Payment Pains</h2>
<h3>By Rayna Katz</h3>
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Payment Pains | Independent planners recoil at Marriott's latest commission move</strong></span>

Independent planners already up in arms over Marriott's new commission related policy, introduced late last year, are now irate over a commission related clause in the company's standard meeting contracts that could mean monetary losses for third-party buyers.

Many buyers have railed against Marriott's new procedures on industry listservs; on Meetings Radio, an Internet radio program; in letters to MeetingNews; and in calls to Marriott. In spite of the outcry, the hotelier is calling the program a success.

Last fall, Marriott announced that, effective June 1, independent planners must be registered with the International Airlines Travel Agent Network (IATAN) to collect their commission payment on business brought to a Marriott, JW Marriott, Renaissance, or limited-service property of the company.

At press time, it was undetermined whether Ritz-Carlton will also implement this program; a Marriott spokesperson said no firm timetable is set for a decision on the luxury brand's participation.

In return for getting the IATAN certification, Marriott promised planners consolidated commission payments and a quicker cutting of checks (see MN, Nov. 27, 2006).

Following the announcement, some planners called for a Marriott boycott, while others went out and got IATAN certification. Then, meeting contracts with the following clause began arriving on planners' desks: "The hotel reserves the right to deduct from any future commissions payable to [the planning company] for other events any commission paid in connection with this event, if the master bill is not paid within six months after the conclusion of the event."

For some third-party meeting managers, that was the last straw.

"I was a supporter of the IATAN requirement because industry certification is a good thing, but Marriott blew it with this clause," said Christy Lamagna of Strategic Meetings and Events, in Bernardsville, NJ. "Enough is enough."

<img class="alignright wp-image-2595 size-medium" title="Independent planners already up in arms over Marriott's new commission related policy, introduced late last year, are now irate over a commission related clause in the company's standard meeting contracts that could mean monetary losses for third-party buyers. Read Payment Pains and learn more." src="https://strategic.events/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/C26E1DKA02-300x200.jpg" alt="Independent planners already up in arms over Marriott's new commission related policy, introduced late last year, are now irate over a commission related clause in the company's standard meeting contracts that could mean monetary losses for third-party buyers. Read Payment Pains and learn more." width="300" height="200" />Marriott officials defended and downplayed, the contract clause.

"Our average speed of payment on commissions had been 90 to 120 days because our hotels were withholding them until master accounts were settled," said Stacie Canova, director, intermediary partners. "So for us to provide consistent payment, we needed to find a way to make payments even when the master bill wasn't settled. We don't anticipate ever needing to enforce this clause."

Added Julius Robinson, vice president of sales intermediaries, "In no way is this meant to take commission away from third parties. I'm sure there will be a process to review these situations on a case-by-case basis."

Marriott officials were motivated to add this clause to the company's meeting agreements, in part, as a way to get independents to nudge deadbeat clients, they said.

But Lamagna countered, "And at what point did I become an unpaid collection agent for Marriott? Fabulous; where do I get my certification for that?"

Added Steve Collins, owner of Resort Meeting Source, in Breckenridge, CO, "First, they instituted this program to save money and now we're supposed to help them chase their customers? What are the Marriott accountants doing these days?"

Still, Canova insisted that most customers have responded positively to the IATAN requirement.

"Many third parties requested this; we're actually receiving accolades," she said. Among fans of the move is David Bruce, managing director of CMP Meeting Services, in Southlake, TX.

"It has made my life a lot easier already, from the standpoint of not having to contact hotels repeatedly to ask when, and if, I'm going to be paid," he said. "I am pushing for other chains to follow suit."

And they may do just that.

Said Fred Shea, vice president of sales at Hyatt Hotels, "We are looking at what Marriott is doing very closely to determine the positive and negative impacts."

A Hilton Hotels spokesperson said the company does not require IATAN certification of meeting planners currently but noted, "We're studying the commission process."

Starwood Hotels is watching the Marriott program with interest but likely is not going to copy the latter company's controversial contract verbiage.

"We won't pay the commission until the master is fully paid," said David Scypinski, senior vice president of industry relations. "Marriott's asking for trouble."

&nbsp;

<em>Tags: Payment Pains, Payment, Event Planning, Event Planners, Strategic Planners, Strategic Events, Corporate Meetings, Corporate Events, Meeting News</em>

[mk_mini_callout]<a href="http://www.meetingstoday.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img class="alignnone wp-image-1400 size-full" title="Meeting News" src="https://strategic.events/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Meeting-News_170_w.jpg" alt="Meeting News" width="170" height="42" /></a>[/mk_mini_callout]